<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: a new friend on Facebook?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cagedether.com/2007/07/10/google-a-new-friend-on-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cagedether.com/2007/07/10/google-a-new-friend-on-facebook/</link>
	<description>Missives from a social media practitioner with a background in media peppered with social research experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: emo</title>
		<link>http://www.cagedether.com/2007/07/10/google-a-new-friend-on-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>emo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cagedether.com/2007/07/10/google-a-new-friend-on-facebook/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>there was a bidding war for facebook between google and yahoo a while ago, but nothing came from it. i guess they&#039;re back on the offensive now they&#039;ve realised they can simply buy out all the top traffic websites. it&#039;s starting to look like a monopoly huh?

but what i was going to comment about was facebook&#039;s ridiculous privacy policy. check out these links, the first is a nice and concise presentation, the other is a bit more wordy:
http://albumoftheday.com/facebook/
http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t34949.html

so combine that with google&#039;s data and what have you got? the basis of a perfect conspiracy theory ;]

the one good thing that might come out of google buying facebook is that, where i doubt facebook would think twice about handing data over to any authorities, google has already fought (and defeated) the american government in court over such things.

but still.. terrifying stuff :]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there was a bidding war for facebook between google and yahoo a while ago, but nothing came from it. i guess they&#8217;re back on the offensive now they&#8217;ve realised they can simply buy out all the top traffic websites. it&#8217;s starting to look like a monopoly huh?</p>
<p>but what i was going to comment about was facebook&#8217;s ridiculous privacy policy. check out these links, the first is a nice and concise presentation, the other is a bit more wordy:<br />
<a href="http://albumoftheday.com/facebook/" rel="nofollow">http://albumoftheday.com/facebook/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t34949.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t34949.html</a></p>
<p>so combine that with google&#8217;s data and what have you got? the basis of a perfect conspiracy theory ;]</p>
<p>the one good thing that might come out of google buying facebook is that, where i doubt facebook would think twice about handing data over to any authorities, google has already fought (and defeated) the american government in court over such things.</p>
<p>but still.. terrifying stuff :]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

